Wednesday, July 3, 2013

The Absurdist's lens

“Stayin alive” plays on as Moriarty waits on the rooftop for the final chapter with Sherlock and you can’t help but break into applause for BBC’s TV series Sherlock, the modern take on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s epic. For me, Professor Moriarty’s reincarnation in the Facebook generation is a digression from a crooked genius in the original to an Absurdist in motion. While Moriarty has the certainty of his inevitable death on the rooftop sequence, he only reflects the boredom his life has been thrust into dealing with the ordinary and in creating distractions to amuse him, Sherlock Holmes being the most recent one. Moriarty listening to Bee Gees while calling Sherlock an eternal naïve for not catching the binary translation of Bach’s tune is a near about Absurdist and certainly as close as this generation can witness one.

Mersault, the protagonist of The Stranger by Albert Camus is a character that confuses you with the decision of what sort of emotions to invest in it. Is it empathy or objectivity or distaste for a total display of callousness and a hardened matter –of- fact approach to life? You are left undecided throughout and that is the whole symbolism Camus wants to exhibit for Absurdism and that’s exactly where the novel becomes an existentialist/absurdist tour de force.  While the source of all philosophical thought is wonder (Aristotle’s inference), Absurdism is distinct for its almost mathematical approach and the fact that it starts with the death of all philosophies. The whole idea of Absurdism centers on the confrontation or constant opposition between two ideals- man’s incessant desire to find a meaning and significance to his life and the universe that is silent, cold and indifferent to a single man in larger scheme of things and whose existence is there without any inherent meaning. Thus, while accepting that human beings inevitably seek to understand life's purpose, Camus takes the skeptical position that the natural world, the universe, and the human enterprise remain silent about any such purpose. Since existence itself has no meaning, we must learn to bear an irresolvable emptiness. This paradoxical situation, then, between our impulse to ask ultimate questions and the impossibility of achieving any adequate answer, is what Camus calls the absurd

Albert Camus extends the idea in The Myth of Sisyphus “There is only one really serious philosophical problem and that is suicide. Deciding whether or not life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question in philosophy. All other questions follow from that”.
What then is Camus's reply to his question about whether or not to commit suicide? What is the Camusean alternative to suicide or hope? The answer is to live without escape and with integrity, in “revolt” and defiance, maintaining the tension intrinsic to human life. Full consciousness, avoiding false solutions such as religion, refusing to submit, and carrying on with vitality and intensity: these are Camus's answers. This is how a life without ultimate meaning can be made worth living. As he said in Nuptials, life's pleasures are inseparable from a keen awareness of these limits.  In response to the lure of suicide, Camus counsels an intensely conscious and active non-resolution. Rejecting any hope of resolving the strain is also to reject despair. Indeed, it is possible, within and against these limits, to speak of happiness. “Happiness and the absurd are two sons of the same earth. They are inseparable” .
It is not that discovering the absurd leads necessarily to happiness, but rather that acknowledging the absurd means also accepting human frailty, an awareness of our limitations, and the fact that we cannot help wishing to go beyond what is possible. For Camus, happiness includes living intensely and sensuously in the present coupled with tragic (due to lack of inherent meaning), lucid, and defiant consciousness, sense of limits, bitterness, determination to keep on, and  refusal of any form of consolation. Camus is also similar in this to Nietzsche, who called upon his readers to “say yes to life,” and live as completely as possible at every moment. Nietzsche's point was that to be wholly alive means being as aware of the negative as of the positive, feeling pain, not shunning any experience, and embracing life “even in its strangest and hardest problems.

Now, returning to where I started: - rendering an absurdist theme to Shelock’s chief villain may or may not be accurate but definitely is a constructed meaning. Life, an abstract entity like fiction can also be rendered a constructed meaning but claims of a divine purpose or cosmic significance are nothing but a mere escape. Absurdism is one of the most attractive school of thought and resembles closely to Existentialism and Nihilism in its contents but divert significantly at the finer points. Here’s avery helpful chart I found: -










Life is no one single, simple thing, but a series of tensions and dilemmas. The most seemingly straightforward features of life are in fact ambiguous and even contradictory. Camus recommends that we avoid trying to resolve them. We need to face the fact that we can never successfully purge ourselves of the impulses that threaten to wreak havoc with our lives. Camus's philosophy, if it has a single message, is that we should learn to tolerate, indeed embrace the frustration and ambivalence that humans cannot escape.